| # |
| # Copyright (C) 2015 Google, Inc |
| # |
| # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ |
| # |
| |
| =========== Table of Contents =========== |
| |
| 1 U-Boot on EFI |
| 1.1 In God's Name, Why? |
| 1.2 Status |
| 1.3 Build Instructions |
| 1.4 Trying it out |
| 1.5 Inner workings |
| 1.6 EFI Application |
| 1.7 EFI Payload |
| 1.8 Tables |
| 1.9 Interrupts |
| 1.10 32/64-bit |
| 1.11 Future work |
| 1.12 Where is the code? |
| |
| 2 EFI on U-Boot |
| 2.1 In God's Name, Why? |
| 2.2 How do I get it? |
| 2.3 Status |
| 2.4 Future work |
| |
| U-Boot on EFI |
| ============= |
| This document provides information about U-Boot running on top of EFI, either |
| as an application or just as a means of getting U-Boot onto a new platform. |
| |
| |
| In God's Name, Why? |
| ------------------- |
| This is useful in several situations: |
| |
| - You have EFI running on a board but U-Boot does not natively support it |
| fully yet. You can boot into U-Boot from EFI and use that until U-Boot is |
| fully ported |
| |
| - You need to use an EFI implementation (e.g. UEFI) because your vendor |
| requires it in order to provide support |
| |
| - You plan to use coreboot to boot into U-Boot but coreboot support does |
| not currently exist for your platform. In the meantime you can use U-Boot |
| on EFI and then move to U-Boot on coreboot when ready |
| |
| - You use EFI but want to experiment with a simpler alternative like U-Boot |
| |
| |
| Status |
| ------ |
| Only x86 is supported at present. If you are using EFI on another architecture |
| you may want to reconsider. However, much of the code is generic so could be |
| ported. |
| |
| U-Boot supports running as an EFI application for 32-bit EFI only. This is |
| not very useful since only a serial port is provided. You can look around at |
| memory and type 'help' but that is about it. |
| |
| More usefully, U-Boot supports building itself as a payload for either 32-bit |
| or 64-bit EFI. U-Boot is packaged up and loaded in its entirety by EFI. Once |
| started, U-Boot changes to 32-bit mode (currently) and takes over the |
| machine. You can use devices, boot a kernel, etc. |
| |
| |
| Build Instructions |
| ------------------ |
| First choose a board that has EFI support and obtain an EFI implementation |
| for that board. It will be either 32-bit or 64-bit. Alternatively, you can |
| opt for using QEMU [1] and the OVMF [2], as detailed below. |
| |
| To build U-Boot as an EFI application (32-bit EFI required), enable CONFIG_EFI |
| and CONFIG_EFI_APP. The efi-x86 config (efi-x86_defconfig) is set up for this. |
| Just build U-Boot as normal, e.g. |
| |
| make efi-x86_defconfig |
| make |
| |
| To build U-Boot as an EFI payload (32-bit or 64-bit EFI can be used), adjust an |
| existing config (like qemu-x86_defconfig) to enable CONFIG_EFI, CONFIG_EFI_STUB |
| and either CONFIG_EFI_STUB_32BIT or CONFIG_EFI_STUB_64BIT. All of these are |
| boolean Kconfig options. Then build U-Boot as normal, e.g. |
| |
| make qemu-x86_defconfig |
| make |
| |
| You will end up with one of these files depending on what you build for: |
| |
| u-boot-app.efi - U-Boot EFI application |
| u-boot-payload.efi - U-Boot EFI payload application |
| |
| |
| Trying it out |
| ------------- |
| QEMU is an emulator and it can emulate an x86 machine. Please make sure your |
| QEMU version is 2.3.0 or above to test this. You can run the payload with |
| something like this: |
| |
| mkdir /tmp/efi |
| cp /path/to/u-boot*.efi /tmp/efi |
| qemu-system-x86_64 -bios bios.bin -hda fat:/tmp/efi/ |
| |
| Add -nographic if you want to use the terminal for output. Once it starts |
| type 'fs0:u-boot-payload.efi' to run the payload or 'fs0:u-boot-app.efi' to |
| run the application. 'bios.bin' is the EFI 'BIOS'. Check [2] to obtain a |
| prebuilt EFI BIOS for QEMU or you can build one from source as well. |
| |
| To try it on real hardware, put u-boot-app.efi on a suitable boot medium, |
| such as a USB stick. Then you can type something like this to start it: |
| |
| fs0:u-boot-payload.efi |
| |
| (or fs0:u-boot-app.efi for the application) |
| |
| This will start the payload, copy U-Boot into RAM and start U-Boot. Note |
| that EFI does not support booting a 64-bit application from a 32-bit |
| EFI (or vice versa). Also it will often fail to print an error message if |
| you get this wrong. |
| |
| |
| Inner workings |
| ============== |
| Here follow a few implementation notes for those who want to fiddle with |
| this and perhaps contribute patches. |
| |
| The application and payload approaches sound similar but are in fact |
| implemented completely differently. |
| |
| EFI Application |
| --------------- |
| For the application the whole of U-Boot is built as a shared library. The |
| efi_main() function is in lib/efi/efi_app.c. It sets up some basic EFI |
| functions with efi_init(), sets up U-Boot global_data, allocates memory for |
| U-Boot's malloc(), etc. and enters the normal init sequence (board_init_f() |
| and board_init_r()). |
| |
| Since U-Boot limits its memory access to the allocated regions very little |
| special code is needed. The CONFIG_EFI_APP option controls a few things |
| that need to change so 'git grep CONFIG_EFI_APP' may be instructive. |
| The CONFIG_EFI option controls more general EFI adjustments. |
| |
| The only available driver is the serial driver. This calls back into EFI |
| 'boot services' to send and receive characters. Although it is implemented |
| as a serial driver the console device is not necessarilly serial. If you |
| boot EFI with video output then the 'serial' device will operate on your |
| target devices's display instead and the device's USB keyboard will also |
| work if connected. If you have both serial and video output, then both |
| consoles will be active. Even though U-Boot does the same thing normally, |
| These are features of EFI, not U-Boot. |
| |
| Very little code is involved in implementing the EFI application feature. |
| U-Boot is highly portable. Most of the difficulty is in modifying the |
| Makefile settings to pass the right build flags. In particular there is very |
| little x86-specific code involved - you can find most of it in |
| arch/x86/cpu. Porting to ARM (which can also use EFI if you are brave |
| enough) should be straightforward. |
| |
| Use the 'reset' command to get back to EFI. |
| |
| EFI Payload |
| ----------- |
| The payload approach is a different kettle of fish. It works by building |
| U-Boot exactly as normal for your target board, then adding the entire |
| image (including device tree) into a small EFI stub application responsible |
| for booting it. The stub application is built as a normal EFI application |
| except that it has a lot of data attached to it. |
| |
| The stub application is implemented in lib/efi/efi_stub.c. The efi_main() |
| function is called by EFI. It is responsible for copying U-Boot from its |
| original location into memory, disabling EFI boot services and starting |
| U-Boot. U-Boot then starts as normal, relocates, starts all drivers, etc. |
| |
| The stub application is architecture-dependent. At present it has some |
| x86-specific code and a comment at the top of efi_stub.c describes this. |
| |
| While the stub application does allocate some memory from EFI this is not |
| used by U-Boot (the payload). In fact when U-Boot starts it has all of the |
| memory available to it and can operate as it pleases (but see the next |
| section). |
| |
| Tables |
| ------ |
| The payload can pass information to U-Boot in the form of EFI tables. At |
| present this feature is used to pass the EFI memory map, an inordinately |
| large list of memory regions. You can use the 'efi mem all' command to |
| display this list. U-Boot uses the list to work out where to relocate |
| itself. |
| |
| Although U-Boot can use any memory it likes, EFI marks some memory as used |
| by 'run-time services', code that hangs around while U-Boot is running and |
| is even present when Linux is running. This is common on x86 and provides |
| a way for Linux to call back into the firmware to control things like CPU |
| fan speed. U-Boot uses only 'conventional' memory, in EFI terminology. It |
| will relocate itself to the top of the largest block of memory it can find |
| below 4GB. |
| |
| Interrupts |
| ---------- |
| U-Boot drivers typically don't use interrupts. Since EFI enables interrupts |
| it is possible that an interrupt will fire that U-Boot cannot handle. This |
| seems to cause problems. For this reason the U-Boot payload runs with |
| interrupts disabled at present. |
| |
| 32/64-bit |
| --------- |
| While the EFI application can in principle be built as either 32- or 64-bit, |
| only 32-bit is currently supported. This means that the application can only |
| be used with 32-bit EFI. |
| |
| The payload stub can be build as either 32- or 64-bits. Only a small amount |
| of code is built this way (see the extra- line in lib/efi/Makefile). |
| Everything else is built as a normal U-Boot, so is always 32-bit on x86 at |
| present. |
| |
| Future work |
| ----------- |
| This work could be extended in a number of ways: |
| |
| - Add a generic x86 EFI payload configuration. At present you need to modify |
| an existing one, but mostly the low-level x86 code is disabled when booting |
| on EFI anyway, so a generic 'EFI' board could be created with a suitable set |
| of drivers enabled. |
| |
| - Add ARM support |
| |
| - Add 64-bit application support |
| |
| - Figure out how to solve the interrupt problem |
| |
| - Add more drivers to the application side (e.g. video, block devices, USB, |
| environment access). This would mostly be an academic exercise as a strong |
| use case is not readily apparent, but it might be fun. |
| |
| - Avoid turning off boot services in the stub. Instead allow U-Boot to make |
| use of boot services in case it wants to. It is unclear what it might want |
| though. |
| |
| Where is the code? |
| ------------------ |
| lib/efi |
| payload stub, application, support code. Mostly arch-neutral |
| |
| arch/x86/lib/efi |
| helper functions for the fake DRAM init, etc. These can be used by |
| any board that runs as a payload. |
| |
| arch/x86/cpu/efi |
| x86 support code for running as an EFI application |
| |
| board/efi/efi-x86/efi.c |
| x86 board code for running as an EFI application |
| |
| common/cmd_efi.c |
| the 'efi' command |
| |
| -- |
| Ben Stoltz, Simon Glass |
| Google, Inc |
| July 2015 |
| |
| [1] http://www.qemu.org |
| [2] http://www.tianocore.org/ovmf/ |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| |
| EFI on U-Boot |
| ============= |
| |
| In addition to support for running U-Boot as a UEFI application, U-Boot itself |
| can also expose the UEFI interfaces and thus allow UEFI payloads to run under |
| it. |
| |
| In God's Name, Why? |
| ------------------- |
| |
| With this support in place, you can run any UEFI payload (such as the Linux |
| kernel, grub2 or gummiboot) on U-Boot. This dramatically simplifies boot loader |
| configuration, as U-Boot based systems now look and feel (almost) the same way |
| as TianoCore based systems. |
| |
| How do I get it? |
| ---------------- |
| |
| EFI support for 32bit ARM and AArch64 is already included in U-Boot. All you |
| need to do is enable |
| |
| CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI=y |
| CONFIG_EFI_LOADER=y |
| |
| in your .config file and you will automatically get a bootefi command to run |
| an efi application as well as snippet in the default distro boot script that |
| scans for removable media efi binaries as fallback. |
| |
| Status |
| ------ |
| |
| I am successfully able to run grub2 and Linux EFI binaries with this code on |
| ARMv7 as well as AArch64 systems. |
| |
| When enabled, the resulting U-Boot binary only grows by ~10KB, so it's very |
| light weight. |
| |
| All storage devices are directly accessible from the uEFI payload |
| |
| Removable media booting (search for /efi/boot/boota{a64,arm}.efi) is supported. |
| |
| Simple use cases like "Plug this SD card into my ARM device and it just |
| boots into grub which boots into Linux", work very well. |
| |
| Future work |
| ----------- |
| |
| Of course, there are still a few things one could do on top: |
| |
| - Improve disk media detection (don't scan, use what information we |
| have) |
| - Add EFI variable support using NVRAM |
| - Add GFX support |
| - Make EFI Shell work |
| - Network device support |
| - Support for payload exit |
| - Payload Watchdog support |