| I2C Bus Arbitration |
| =================== |
| |
| While I2C supports multi-master buses this is difficult to get right. |
| The implementation on the master side in software is quite complex. |
| Clock-stretching and the arbitrary time that an I2C transaction can take |
| make it difficult to share the bus fairly in the face of high traffic. |
| When one or more masters can be reset independently part-way through a |
| transaction it is hard to know the state of the bus. |
| |
| U-Boot provides a scheme based on two 'claim' GPIOs, one driven by the |
| AP (Application Processor, meaning the main CPU) and one driven by the EC |
| (Embedded Controller, a small CPU aimed at handling system tasks). With |
| these they can communicate and reliably share the bus. This scheme has |
| minimal overhead and involves very little code. The scheme can survive |
| reboots by either side without difficulty. |
| |
| Since U-Boot runs on the AP, the terminology used is 'our' claim GPIO, |
| meaning the AP's, and 'their' claim GPIO, meaning the EC's. This terminology |
| is used by the device tree bindings in Linux also. |
| |
| The driver is implemented as an I2C mux, as it is in Linux. See |
| i2c-arb-gpio-challenge for the implementation. |
| |
| GPIO lines are shared between the AP and EC to manage the bus. The AP and EC |
| each have a 'bus claim' line, which is an output that the other can see. |
| |
| - AP_CLAIM: output from AP, signalling to the EC that the AP wants the bus |
| - EC_CLAIM: output from EC, signalling to the AP that the EC wants the bus |
| |
| The basic algorithm is to assert your line when you want the bus, then make |
| sure that the other side doesn't want it also. A detailed explanation is best |
| done with an example. |
| |
| Let's say the AP wants to claim the bus. It: |
| |
| 1. Asserts AP_CLAIM |
| 2. Waits a little bit for the other side to notice (slew time) |
| 3. Checks EC_CLAIM. If this is not asserted, then the AP has the bus, and we |
| are done |
| 4. Otherwise, wait for a few milliseconds (retry time) and see if EC_CLAIM is |
| released |
| 5. If not, back off, release the claim and wait for a few more milliseconds |
| (retry time again) |
| 6. Go back to 1 if things don't look wedged (wait time has expired) |
| 7. Panic. The other side is hung with the CLAIM line set. |
| |
| The same algorithm applies on the EC. |
| |
| To release the bus, just de-assert the claim line. |
| |
| Typical delays are: |
| - slew time 10 us |
| - retry time 3 ms |
| - wait time - 50ms |
| |
| In general the traffic is fairly light, and in particular the EC wants access |
| to the bus quite rarely (maybe every 10s or 30s to check the battery). This |
| scheme works very nicely with very low contention. There is only a 10 us |
| wait for access to the bus assuming that the other side isn't using it. |