| Zuul |
| ==== |
| |
| Zuul is a project gating system developed for the OpenStack Project. |
| |
| We are currently engaged in a significant development effort in |
| preparation for the third major version of Zuul. We call this effort |
| `Zuul v3`_ and it is described in more detail below. |
| |
| Contributing |
| ------------ |
| |
| We are currently engaged in a significant development effort in |
| preparation for the third major version of Zuul. We call this effort |
| `Zuul v3`_ and it is described in this file in the `feature/zuulv3` |
| branch of this repo. |
| |
| To browse the latest code, see: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/zuul/tree/ |
| To clone the latest code, use `git clone git://git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/zuul` |
| |
| Bugs are handled at: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/679 |
| |
| Code reviews are, as you might expect, handled by gerrit at |
| https://review.openstack.org |
| |
| Use `git review` to submit patches (after creating a Gerrit account |
| that links to your launchpad account). Example:: |
| |
| # Do your commits |
| $ git review |
| # Enter your username if prompted |
| |
| Zuul v3 |
| ------- |
| |
| The Zuul v3 effort involves significant changes to Zuul, and its |
| companion program, Nodepool. The intent is for Zuul to become more |
| generally useful outside of the OpenStack community. This is the best |
| way to get started with this effort: |
| |
| 1) Read the Zuul v3 spec: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack-infra/infra-specs/specs/zuulv3.html |
| |
| We use specification documents like this to describe large efforts |
| where we want to make sure that all the participants are in |
| agreement about what will happen and generally how before starting |
| development. These specs should contain enough information for |
| people to evaluate the proposal generally, and sometimes include |
| specific details that need to be agreed upon in advance. They are |
| living documents which can change as work gets underway. However, |
| every change or detail does not need to be reflected in the spec -- |
| most work is simply done with patches (and revised if necessary in |
| code review). |
| |
| 2) Read the Nodepool build-workers spec: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack-infra/infra-specs/specs/nodepool-zookeeper-workers.html |
| |
| 3) Review any proposed updates to these specs: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack-infra/infra-specs+topic:zuulv3 |
| |
| Some of the information in the specs may be effectively superceded |
| by changes here, which are still undergoing review. |
| |
| 4) Read documentation on the internal data model and testing: http://docs.openstack.org/infra/zuul/feature/zuulv3/internals.html |
| |
| The general philosophy for Zuul tests is to perform functional |
| testing of either the individual component or the entire end-to-end |
| system with external systems (such as Gerrit) replaced with fakes. |
| Before adding additional unit tests with a narrower focus, consider |
| whether they add value to this system or are merely duplicative of |
| functional tests. |
| |
| 5) Review open changes: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+branch:feature/zuulv3 |
| |
| We find that the most valuable code reviews are ones that spot |
| problems with the proposed change, or raise questions about how |
| that might affect other systems or subsequent work. It is also a |
| great way to stay involved as a team in work performed by others |
| (for instance, by observing and asking questions about development |
| while it is in progress). We try not to sweat the small things and |
| don't worry too much about style suggestions or other nitpicky |
| things (unless they are relevant -- for instance, a -1 vote on a |
| change that introduces a yaml change out of character with existing |
| conventions is useful because it makes the system more |
| user-friendly; a -1 vote on a change which uses a sub-optimal line |
| breaking strategy is probably not the best use of anyone's time). |
| |
| 6) Join #zuul on Freenode. Let others (especially jeblair who is |
| trying to coordinate and prioritize work) know what you would like |
| to work on. |
| |
| 7) Check storyboard for status of current work items: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/board/41 |
| |
| Work items tagged with ``low-hanging-fruit`` are tasks that have |
| been identified as not requiring an expansive knowledge of the |
| system. They may still require either some knowledge or |
| investigation into a specific area, but should be suitable for a |
| developer who is becoming acquainted with the system. Those items |
| can be found at: |
| https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/list?tags=low-hanging-fruit&tags=zuulv3 |
| |
| Once you are up to speed on those items, it will be helpful to know |
| the following: |
| |
| * Zuul v3 includes some substantial changes to Zuul, and in order to |
| implement them quickly and simultaneously, we temporarily disabled |
| most of the test suite. That test suite still has relevance, but |
| tests are likely to need updating individually, with reasons ranging |
| from something simple such as a test-framework method changing its |
| name, to more substantial issues, such as a feature being removed as |
| part of the v3 work. Each test will need to be evaluated |
| individually. Feel free to, at any time, claim a test name in this |
| story and work on re-enabling it: |
| https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2000773 |
| |
| * Because of the importance of external systems, as well as the number |
| of internal Zuul components, actually running Zuul in a development |
| mode quickly becomes unweildy (imagine uploading changes to Gerrit |
| repeatedly while altering Zuul source code). Instead, the best way |
| to develop with Zuul is in fact to write a functional test. |
| Construct a test to fully simulate the series of events you want to |
| see, then run it in the foreground. For example:: |
| |
| .tox/py27/bin/python -m testtools.run tests.test_scheduler.TestScheduler.test_jobs_launched |
| |
| See TESTING.rst for more information. |
| |
| * There are many occasions, when working on sweeping changes to Zuul |
| v3, we left notes for future work items in the code marked with |
| "TODOv3". These represent potentially serious missing functionality |
| or other issues which must be resolved before an initial v3 release |
| (unlike a more conventional TODO note, these really can not be left |
| indefinitely). These present an opportunity to identify work items |
| not otherwise tracked. The names associated with TODO or TODOv3 |
| items do not mean that only that person can address them -- they |
| simply reflect who to ask to explain the item in more detail if it |
| is too cryptic. In your own work, feel free to leave TODOv3 notes |
| if a change would otherwise become too large or unweildy. |
| |
| Roadmap |
| ------- |
| |
| * Begin using Zuul v3 to run jobs for Zuul itself |
| * Implement a shim to translate Zuul v2 demand into Nodepool Zookeeper |
| launcher requests |
| * Begin using Zookeeper based Nodepool launchers with Zuul v2.5 in |
| OpenStack Infra |
| * Move OpenStack Infra to use Zuul v3 |
| * Implement Github support |
| * Begin using Zuul v3 to run tests on Ansible repos |
| * Implement support in Nodepool for non-OpenStack clouds |
| * Add native container support to Zuul / Nodepool |