treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
diff --git a/board/menlo/m53menlo/m53menlo.c b/board/menlo/m53menlo/m53menlo.c
index d4288a2..893f625 100644
--- a/board/menlo/m53menlo/m53menlo.c
+++ b/board/menlo/m53menlo/m53menlo.c
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
#define SD_PAD_CTRL (PAD_CTL_HYS | PAD_CTL_PUS_47K_UP | \
PAD_CTL_DSE_HIGH)
-int board_mmc_init(bd_t *bis)
+int board_mmc_init(struct bd_info *bis)
{
static const iomux_v3_cfg_t sd1_pads[] = {
NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD1_CMD__ESDHC1_CMD, SD_CMD_PAD_CTRL),
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@
gpio_direction_output(IMX_GPIO_NR(6, 0), 0);
}
-int ft_board_setup(void *blob, bd_t *bd)
+int ft_board_setup(void *blob, struct bd_info *bd)
{
if (lvds_compat_string)
do_fixup_by_path_string(blob, "/panel", "compatible",