libfdt: Add fdt_next_subnode() to permit easy subnode iteration
Iterating through subnodes with libfdt is a little painful to write as we
need something like this:
for (depth = 0, count = 0,
offset = fdt_next_node(fdt, parent_offset, &depth);
(offset >= 0) && (depth > 0);
offset = fdt_next_node(fdt, offset, &depth)) {
if (depth == 1) {
/* code body */
}
}
Using fdt_next_subnode() we can instead write this, which is shorter and
easier to get right:
for (offset = fdt_first_subnode(fdt, parent_offset);
offset >= 0;
offset = fdt_next_subnode(fdt, offset)) {
/* code body */
}
Also, it doesn't require two levels of indentation for the loop body.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
(Cherry-picked from dtc commit 4e76ec79)
Acked-by: Gerald Van Baren <vanbaren@cideas.com>
diff --git a/lib/libfdt/fdt.c b/lib/libfdt/fdt.c
index 387e354..154e9a4 100644
--- a/lib/libfdt/fdt.c
+++ b/lib/libfdt/fdt.c
@@ -202,6 +202,34 @@
return offset;
}
+int fdt_first_subnode(const void *fdt, int offset)
+{
+ int depth = 0;
+
+ offset = fdt_next_node(fdt, offset, &depth);
+ if (offset < 0 || depth != 1)
+ return -FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND;
+
+ return offset;
+}
+
+int fdt_next_subnode(const void *fdt, int offset)
+{
+ int depth = 1;
+
+ /*
+ * With respect to the parent, the depth of the next subnode will be
+ * the same as the last.
+ */
+ do {
+ offset = fdt_next_node(fdt, offset, &depth);
+ if (offset < 0 || depth < 1)
+ return -FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND;
+ } while (depth > 1);
+
+ return offset;
+}
+
const char *_fdt_find_string(const char *strtab, int tabsize, const char *s)
{
int len = strlen(s) + 1;